|
May 6, 2019, The Globe & Mail: Will Windsor's new hospital heal the city or do it harm?
|
|
CAMPP Reports to Decision Makers:
- September 2016: CAMPP Analysis of Proposed Secondary Plan Amendment and Zoning By-Laws
- July 2017: The Tail Wagging A Large Dog
- August 2018: Building For The Past
- January 2020: Transit Master Plan
- October 2020: Sandwich South Master Servicing Plan
- September 2016: CAMPP Analysis of Proposed Secondary Plan Amendment and Zoning By-Laws
- July 2017: The Tail Wagging A Large Dog
- August 2018: Building For The Past
- January 2020: Transit Master Plan
- October 2020: Sandwich South Master Servicing Plan
Court Dismisses Citizens for an Accountable Mega-Hospital Planning (CAMPP’s) Request for Leave to Appeal from LPAT Decision Regarding Windsor Mega Hospital
In a 47 page ruling released Wednesday, July 29, 2020, the Ontario Divisional Court has dismissed a motion for leave to appeal from a recent decision of the Ontario Local Planning Appeal Tribunal (“LPAT”) brought by CAMPP and awarded costs to the City of Windsor and Windsor Regional Hospital of $25,000 plus HST.
CAMPP is a Windsor-Essex residents’ advocacy group established in 2014 to represent the interests of residents with concerns over the proposed location of the new Windsor-Essex single site acute care hospital. CAMPP initially appealed to the LPAT on various grounds. On December 3, 2019, its appeal was dismissed. CAMPP was seeking permission to appeal from that decision to a panel of Judges of the Divisional Court on four questions of law.
CAMPP was successful on a number of the issues it raised in its leave motion. For example, the Court found the majority of CAMPP’s issues (3 of 4) raised proper questions of law, part of the test for granting leave. However, the Court determined for a variety of reasons that the issues did not satisfy the balance of the test for leave. The Court also found CAMPP is a “public interest litigant” but still awarded costs.
“The decision is somewhat difficult to reconcile with some of the existing decisions,” said Eric Gillespie, legal counsel for CAMPP. “As a result, we will be continuing to review the case.” There is no ability to appeal the leave decision. However, the Court made rulings on other matters that can be directly appealed to the Divisional Court. “As is done in the normal course of any case such as this, we will be advising our client regarding its appeal options. A decision regarding any appeal(s) will be announced once it has been reached, which will be shortly,” Gillespie said.
In a 47 page ruling released Wednesday, July 29, 2020, the Ontario Divisional Court has dismissed a motion for leave to appeal from a recent decision of the Ontario Local Planning Appeal Tribunal (“LPAT”) brought by CAMPP and awarded costs to the City of Windsor and Windsor Regional Hospital of $25,000 plus HST.
CAMPP is a Windsor-Essex residents’ advocacy group established in 2014 to represent the interests of residents with concerns over the proposed location of the new Windsor-Essex single site acute care hospital. CAMPP initially appealed to the LPAT on various grounds. On December 3, 2019, its appeal was dismissed. CAMPP was seeking permission to appeal from that decision to a panel of Judges of the Divisional Court on four questions of law.
CAMPP was successful on a number of the issues it raised in its leave motion. For example, the Court found the majority of CAMPP’s issues (3 of 4) raised proper questions of law, part of the test for granting leave. However, the Court determined for a variety of reasons that the issues did not satisfy the balance of the test for leave. The Court also found CAMPP is a “public interest litigant” but still awarded costs.
“The decision is somewhat difficult to reconcile with some of the existing decisions,” said Eric Gillespie, legal counsel for CAMPP. “As a result, we will be continuing to review the case.” There is no ability to appeal the leave decision. However, the Court made rulings on other matters that can be directly appealed to the Divisional Court. “As is done in the normal course of any case such as this, we will be advising our client regarding its appeal options. A decision regarding any appeal(s) will be announced once it has been reached, which will be shortly,” Gillespie said.
CAMPP Hospital Appeal
The Citizens for an Accountable Mega-Hospital Planning Process (CAMPP) have asked the Divisional Court to allow five issues to be considered in detail at a future hearing:
- ensuring emergency services are properly located when the new hospital is built
- planning that properly considers climate change impacts
- the City’s obligation to consult with First Nations
- apparent unresolved conflicts in expert evidence
- the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic which could not have been considered when the new hospital was being planned.
________
Please Support Our Legal Challenge
|
Hospitals belong where people live. Residents of Windsor, Ontario are left with no choice but to take their healthcare into their own hands by launching a legal campaign to keep hospital services within the region's most densely populated neighbourhoods.
Both Windsor Regional Hospital (WRH) campuses (Met & Ouellette) are to be replaced by a single regional mega-hospital located on active farmland 13 km (8 miles) from the city centre. This will make hospital-based services much less accessible for tens of thousands of Windsor’s 200,000 residents. Local officials have used mixed messages and strategically limited public input and discussion about the greenfield mega-plan. This has misled many residents into believing they are gaining an additional hospital rather than losing two. Join our fight to give our residents a voice in this process. We fully believe in the need for updated local healthcare infrastructures. However, a decision this monumental, which will affect our healthcare for generations to come, should result from a process that is completely transparent and inclusive. The only way we can achieve this result is by winning our legal appeal. However, this is a complex and costly legal challenge. We need your support. When you donate, no matter how large or small, you are raising your hand (publicly or anonymously) that you believe that hospitals belong where people live. |
|
More about the issue:
The proposed WRH mega-hospital is part of a larger development scheme: the Sandwich South Secondary Plan. The mega-hospital is to be built on what is currently active farmland adjacent to Windsor's airport. The 60-acre facility is being used to justify the residential and commercial development of a further 1,000 acres of prime agricultural land. Yet, when you look at current statistics, the need for a new subdivision outside of the city core is not supported: the local population is aging and economic growth is stagnant. Other communities are tackling their healthcare infrastructure modernization by taking advantage of existing urban infrastructure. While the mega-plan may temporarily benefit a few developers, it will increase Windsor’s long-term residential tax burden and create barriers to healthcare for many of the city's most vulnerable people. Developing Sandwich South also disregards Windsor's Official Plan and Ontario's Provincial Policy Statement. It creates further urban sprawl at a time when other municipalities are shifting to implement more environmentally responsible planning policies. For five years, fact-based concerns raised by Citizens For An Accountable Mega-Hospital Planning Process, along with community groups that include the Ontario Health Coalition, and a growing number of individuals willing to speak out publicly, have been ignored. Together, we have been pleading with local decision-makers to develop a legitimately responsible, inclusive and transparent planning process. This destructive scheme will affect the region’s health, economic and environmental well-being for generations to come. While hospital officials encourage staff to express their support, the public is largely unaware that medical personnel are prevented from voicing negative concerns. There’s no debate about the need for updated local health care infrastructures. Residents in outlying municipalities also need and deserve accessible healthcare, though the solution does not lie in pitting county residents against city residents. There are better ways to improve Essex County residents' access to healthcare services that do not involve gutting the city core. CAMPP's LPAT appeal and beyond In October, 2019 the LPAT heard our legal challenge of Windsor City Council`s August 13, 2018 decision to greenlight the proposed mega-facility. Twenty-eight organizations and individuals received permission to join the appeal as participants. On December 3, 2019 the LPAT Tribunal (presided over by a single adjudicator) summarily dismissed our case. On December 18, 2019 we announced our intention to appeal the LPAT's Decision based on four key issues: - Keeping emergency hospital services where people live - No consultation occurred with First Nations - Climate change was not considered - Implausible employment growth projections were used to determine land needs We anticipate accruing more than $100,000 in legal fees to win this challenge. We expect a long fight. A note to health care professionals and other supporters who may need to remain anonymous: We thank those of you who have supported our efforts but could not publicly come forward. We want to assure those who will financially contribute to this important campaign, that all anonymous contributions will remain completely confidential. For media enquiries, please contact Philippa von Ziegenweidt via our contact page. |
|
"Given the legitimacy of the concerns raised by the public ... the duty to consider, address and engage concerns regarding the planning process, the planning rationale, mobility, access and equity are insufficiently met to satisfy even the most basic interpretations of the expectations from community engagement..." -- Jennifer Keesmaat
|
|
Thousands of residents have declared their displeasure with the anticipated closing of Windsor's urban hospitals with lawn signs: "Don't Close Met and Ouellette, We All Deserve Better!", "Re-think the Mega-Plan, It's not a Done Deal" and "Re-think the Mega-Hospital, We Deserve a Better Plan!"
|
